
Driving Magazine
took us to task with some rolling road tests and found out for themselves just
how good this stuff is!
"Sounds too good to be true? Well, Driving certainly thought so, and was
invited to take along a car - preferably one with at least 50,000 miles on the
clock - and get manufacturers Ecotek to put their gunk where there mouth was.
Unfortunately we only have nice new test cars at the office and for a moment it
looked like providing a clapped-out vehicle in need of TLC at short notice would
prove almost as unlikely as Power Boost's claims. Step forward Driving's
redoubtable Advertising Manager, David Breary, and his Volvo 850 with more than
a hundred thousand miles on the clock. And you thought advertising executives
all drove shiny Porsches and Mercs . . .
Said much maligned Volvo was promptly put on a rolling road at a nearby garage
and tested for power, emissions and economy. Just a few minutes later, under the
watchful and nervous eyes of Mr Breary, the air intake hose was disconnected and
a entire can of the magic gunk (liquid foam actually) was emptied into the
running engine in two minute bursts with three minutes idling time between each
application.
With the can now empty and Mr Breary looking ever more nervous and now strangely
sentimental about his Volvo, the car was 'driven' hard for ten minutes using the
full range of each gear. It was then subjected to more rigorous testing and
results compared with the initial test.
In terms of maximum power output, there was an improvement albeit not a dramatic
one. This wasn't surprising considering the fact that David's Volvo exceeded
manufacturer's specifications for the model by a full 5bhp on its first test!
However, in terms of overall power delivery throughout the full rev range, the
improvements are notable. Power delivery after application was much quicker and
much smoother as shown by the steeper and more even curve on the graph.
After relaxing somewhat and having a chance to drive the car for a while, David
says it now runs noticeably smoother as well, with appreciably improved economy
on motorway driving. All in all an impressive product that really does do
what it says on the can!"
THE
SUNDAY TIMES
When The Sunday Times puts a product in their 'Driving'
section you'd be surprised how much trouble they go to to make sure it's ok.
You might have thought they just ask the
manufacturer and take their word - NO WAY!
Read what they wrote about PowerBoost - then we'll
show you what they did to make sure it actually does what it says on the can.
"ENERGISE YOUR ENGINE
Getting
an engine tune-up in an aerosol might sound far-fetched, but that's what
Powerboost is claimed to provide. They might not need regular top-end "de-cokes'
like they used to, but even today's petrol and diesel engines can still gum up
to some extent over high mileages and, if poorly maintained, accumulate the
varnish found in some modern fuels.
The 600ml Powerboost can is squirted into the air intake of an engine
running at between 2,500 and 3,000rpm and the chemicals react in the heat of
combustion to remove carbon and varnish deposits from the valves, pistons and
combustion chambers.
The results are said to be lower emissions and improved power and torque.
At £27.50 Powerboost could be a cheap way to revive an older car...." The Sunday
Times - June 1st 2003
Just
to do this little article they sent a well known and respected motoring
journalist with a strong technical background called Dave Pollard. He got us to
organise a full rolling road and emissions test of his wife's 100k miles Honda
under his supervision. Here is one of our technicians Tim Richardson putting in
the PowerBoost and here is the Honda on the rolling road.
The stats were pretty impressive - There was a 13% increase in BHP at 2000
rpm and 17% at 4000 rpm. Emissions were noticeably reduced especially at full
throttle and Hydrocarbons were 80% lower at idle. There was a 7% improvement in
Torque at full throttle and a better Lambda in all cases. Here are the actual
stats:
|
Before PowerBoost Applied |
|
|
|
After PowerBoost Applied |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Full Throttle |
|
|
|
At Full Throttle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power @ Wheels |
|
62.6 BHP |
|
Power @ Wheels |
|
63.9 BHP |
|
Transmission Loss |
|
19.0 BHP |
|
Transmission Loss |
|
19.0 BHP |
|
Engine Power |
|
81.6 BHP |
|
Engine Power |
|
83.0 BHP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Torque |
|
1.24 K/N |
|
Torque |
|
1.32 K/N |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emissions @ Idle |
|
|
|
Emissions @ Idle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrocarbons |
|
49 |
|
Hydrocarbons |
|
12 |
|
CO2 |
|
14.8 |
|
CO2 |
|
15.6 |
|
O2 |
|
0.98 |
|
O2 |
|
0.14 |
|
Lambda |
|
1.044 |
|
Lambda |
|
1.006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Emissions @ Full Throttle |
|
|
|
Emissions @ Full Throttle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrocarbons |
|
87 |
|
Hydrocarbons |
|
100 |
|
CO2 |
|
12.1 |
|
CO2 |
|
9.9 |
|
O2 |
|
0 |
|
O2 |
|
0 |
|
Lambda |
|
0.788 |
|
Lambda |
|
0.738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 2000 RPM |
|
|
|
At 2000 RPM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrocarbons |
|
88 |
|
Hydrocarbons |
|
115 |
|
CO2 |
|
12.9 |
|
CO2 |
|
12.1 |
|
O2 |
|
0 |
|
O2 |
|
0 |
|
Lambda |
|
0.844 |
|
Lambda |
|
0.83 |
|
BHP |
|
27.2 |
|
BHP |
|
30.8 |
|
Torque K/N |
|
1.23 |
|
Torque K/N |
|
1.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At 4000 RPM |
|
|
|
At 4000 RPM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydrocarbons |
|
102 |
|
Hydrocarbons |
|
146 |
|
CO2 |
|
12 |
|
CO2 |
|
11.7 |
|
O2 |
|
0 |
|
O2 |
|
0 |
|
Lambda |
|
0.812 |
|
Lambda |
|
0.808 |
|
BHP |
|
46.2 |
|
BHP |
|
54 |
|
Torque K/N |
|
1.23 |
|
Torque K/N |
|
1.25 |
So there you have it - next time you see a small
article in a reputable National Newspaper you'll know how much goes on behind
the scenes to maintain their quality reputation!

Migweb is probably one of the most popular Vauxhall tuning Club sites on
the net - Mike Warner the webmaster tried out PowerBoost on his friend Sean's
Calibra - here's what they found:
"The car was strapped to the rollers and all sensors
attached to the engine and exhaust. He managed a result of 129bhp at the wheels
- about right for his engine. Without taking the car off the rollers the engine
continued to run and we went to work in using the Power Boost spray. We
instantly spotted that the spray came out as green foam - very unlike any other
inlet cleaner product we have previously come across. Once the whole tin was
used, a second power run was completed.
Please
note that the car had remained on the rollers throughout the test and no
settings on the rolling road software were adjusted in any way. The second run
showed 132.9bhp - an increase of 3.9bhp. It should also be noted that the power
curve appeared to be smoother on the second run.
Out on the road, Sean reported back an instantly noticeable increase in power
and smoothness and was very happy with the result. I could also detect a
slightly smoother engine response.
This product appears to do exactly what it promises
to do, so we can't fault it. For £27, this is good going for an increase in
3.9bhp. Depending on the type, age and condition of your engine you could see
even more of an increase. If you feel your engine is getting a little tired, it
may be worth trying Power Boost spray out."
Thanks Mike - click on the article for an enlarged
version.
Ecotek
has come up with an aerosol product called Powerboost which it claims cleans and
de-cokes, increases power, promotes smoother running, lowers emissions and
improves fuel economy of petrol and diesel engines.
That is quite a
claim, but Ecotek invited What Van? to a practical demonstration on the rolling
road at Power Engineering in Uxbridge. Middlesex. The test bed was a six year
old Mazda E2000 (2-litre petrol) with 70,000 miles on the clock.
The process is
straight forward. You spray the liquid foam into the air intake for two minutes
while the engine is revving between 2,500rpm and 3,OO0 rpm, leave it idling for
three minutes, then repeat until the foam is exhausted. The can holds at least
eight minutes worth of treatment.
The
result was a couple of extra bhp and a slight reduction in CO2 emissions. The
van's owner reckons it is running smoother, is more responsive and there's a
2mpg improvement in fuel economy, which is an extra 22 miles per tankfull or
1,100 miles per year.
Powerboost costs
£27.50 (600ml) and could be a sound investment for that overstressed workhorse.
What Van Magazine November
2003. So you don't have to own a thoroughbred sports car to benefit - thanks
Guys!
A very thorough test was done The Express & Star by Syd Taylor
- here's an excerpt (click on the picture to see the full
version):
"What's in it'', I wondered. "Liquefied nitrous oxide,
bicarbonate of soda, senna pods?" I would have dismissed this as not worth a
second look had it not been put to me by a man highly respected in the
automotive industry and who has himself seen the rise and fall of potions in
cans promising much, but delivering little - so much so that most journalists
(myself included) have grown weary of investigating them.
Friend Eddy Edge from Sparkbrook volunteered the ideal car for treatment His
150,000 mile Volvo 2.3 Turbo 940 Estate has a history of motorway miles in its
early life, but now spends most of its time in towns with the occasional long
run to clear the tubes. At Walsall's Midland Performance Centre tests were
carried out on a rolling road and a Dyno measured power, torque and exhaust
emissions before and after treatment. No mechanical or electronic adjustments
were made and all settings were to manufacturers specifications when checked.
There
was certainly no 'jiggery pokery' as Eddy and I kept an eye on the proceedings.
Before treatment, the Volvo's output at the rear wheels was measured and,
worryingly, lots of noxious pollutants that would have meant MOT failure were
being pumped out of the exhaust as the engine puffed and gasped its way through
swimming pools full of fuel.
After treatment the power increased dramatically from 155 bhp to 165 bhp.
Similarly an increase in torque from 213 Ib.ft to 229 Ib ft. underlines what the
product can do. Powerboost is not, therefore, a misnomer. It does just what it
says on the can and restores power and efficiency.
I asked both the representative from Ecotek and the Dyno operator if this was an
extraordinary result and I was assured that it was not unusual to see such
increases in engines of this type and mileage. It was pointed out that even with
the latest engine technology and fuels, residue can still settle, leading to
carbon build up with the result that valves and piston rings begin to stick and
in some cases carbon deposits can result in pinking. This might be compensated
for and masked by the engine management, but at a cost in power and performance.
Powerboost purges engines of deleterious matter as the foam from the aerosol is
turned to a gas by the combustion process. The gas is sufficiently caustic to
clean the engine. A Dyno, is the true measure of results, but not everyone who
uses Powerboost will have access to one, so it's important that there's a
positive 'subjective' improvement too.
The Volvo's owner Eddy assures me that there is. Sharper throttle response and
smoother running are the most noticeable changes, he reports, together with an
extra 63 miles per tankful of fuel.
In reality, these are the benefits you and I would notice rather than 'restored
power' because it takes a perceptive driver to notice even a 10 bhp gain at high
revs when you're dealing with more than 125 bhp. You'd have to be using the
engine at ten-tenths' to notice the difference, and how often do you do that?
Doubting Thomas's might say many 150,000 mile engines are held together by
carbon and lacquer and once it is removed they become rattling oil burners that
rev more freely for a time and then either fall apart or coke up again. I'm
pleased to report that in this case, the engine is quieter, smoother and burns
no oil.
What did happen was that exhaust emissions went from levels way below MOT
standard to levels where it would pass easily - so it seems that Powerboost is
an effective breath freshener too".
Thanks Syd!
More Reviews here
Click here for purchase details.